UKAI Publishes Creative Industries Report
UKAI brought together representatives of the AI and creative industries for a roundtable discussion, chaired by Baroness Thangam Debbonaire. The proposed changes to the UK’s copyright law and their impact on the creative industries were top of the agenda.
Paris AI Summit Day One
Paris AI Summit Day One Cycling back from the Grand Palais, Paris’s streets were gridlocked thanks to road closures caused by the AI Summit. The disruption, attendees joked, was mimicking what’s to come with AI.But as Faculty’s Marc Warner told the Tony Blair Institute, ‘deals will be done here’ because the summit has, with a much wider remit than the Bletchley original, become the centre of AI hype and a genuine gathering point for the whole industry.What it hasn’t done, however, is covered the cracks in divergent international positions.Here are five questions people are asking themselves: Can Europe establish itself as the AI superpower it ought to be? Success stories such as Mistral are the exception, and will the major new investments announced here turn out to really be new money? Summit sources are briefing that who signs the final communique doesn’t matter, because of important announcements on monitoring the impact of AI via new observatories, and on commitments to open source. Is that just what they have to say with the US and the UK unlikely to sign it? Which is the biggest elephant in the room – the likelihood of AGI in 3-5 years, the impact of AI on energy use, or the challenges some maintain could come from AI destroying humanity? All of these are getting relatively little attention compared to expectations. With policymakers inevitably reacting rather than leading the AI revolution, what is the best course to try to take? Attracting investment and focusing on skills feels like the only option, but neither is likely to be sufficient for countries currently lagging. What’s the best way to encourage adoption? Literacy, identifying game-changing data sets and also working out how to reshape tasks so AI is most useful – all of these have interesting roles to play, but nobody has neat answers here in Paris. Tomorrow, JD Vance and other political leaders will make the weather – hopefully an improvement on the metaphorical and literal cold rain here so far.
Copyright and AI Webinar
Webinar on Copyright and AI The “Copyright & AI: What’s at Stake?” webinar explored the evolving challenges surrounding copyright law, artificial intelligence and the creative industries in the UK. Experts Thangam Debbonaire and Sir Robert Buckland KBE, KC discussed the immense economic and cultural importance of the UK’s creative sector, which contributes £125 billion to the economy and enhances the country’s global influence. However, a significant portion of the industry consists of self-employed creators and small businesses who lack the legal and financial resources to challenge global tech giants. The discussion emphasised that copyright law has long served as a fundamental tool to protect these creators, ensuring they are compensated when their work is used by others. A key focus of the webinar was whether current copyright law is equipped to handle AI and big tech developments. Traditionally, UK copyright law has operated on an “opt-in” model, meaning that copyrighted content cannot be used without explicit permission. However, proposed government changes would shift this to an “opt-out” system, raising concerns about whether this disadvantages UK creators. Questions were also raised about enforcement, how can copyright law be meaningful if violations occur undetected There was also debate about whether aligning with the EU AI Act could strengthen protections, as the EU is expected to take a firmer stance on AI companies using copyrighted materials without authorisation. The discussion also addressed broader legal and policy considerations, including whether copyright law should be the primary tool for regulating big tech or whether other legal frameworks might be more effective. Comparisons were drawn to international approaches, with uncertainty around how the US will regulate AI and copyright, while the EU appears to be moving toward stricter enforcement. The UK government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan suggested alignment with the EU on copyright, but concerns remain about whether this would bias the outcome of ongoing policy consultations. Watch Full Recording Highlight Videos https://youtu.be/oaEQbNN9JTwhttps://youtu.be/u66gWsLwAzshttps://youtu.be/Kv_WAMe1dxw
UKAI Quoted on the BBC
UKAI Quoted on the BBC Commenting on the AI Action Plan UKAI’s CEO was quoted by the BBC. Tim Flagg welcomed the Action Plan, but highlighted that it was very narrow in scope and pointed out that the AI sector is made up of many different types of business beyond just tech-businesses. Read the Article
How do we evaluate the AI Opportunities Action Plan?
How do we evaluate the AI Opportunities Action Plan? The UK Government has announced that the AI Opportunities Action Plan is coming, and when it arrives I am sure that there will be a lot of opinions on whether it is good, or bad and on what it misses, and hopefully what it gets right. Over the last few months UKAI has been talking to members, businesses across the UK in the AI sector, to understand what they care about most. These have been distilled down into 5 Policy Pillars. UKAI can now measure the Action Plan against these 5 Policy Pillars in our Evaluation Scorecard. This gives us a way to quantify the plan, comparing it with previous and future policies, and measuring how effective it is at supporting UK businesses in the AI Sector. We’re confident that there will be a lot of great actionable ideas. Our optimism is because the plan was authored by Matt Clifford, a successful, well known and well connected entrepreneur. Clifford understands the realities of running businesses. In addition, Clifford and the department have spoken to many businesses across the AI sector. UKAI was formed to provide a voice into the Government for the AI sector and to help the Government implement its AI policies and plans, so for us the Action Plan is fundamental. It should be the linchpin that brings Government and Businesses together with Academia and Investors in a plan that can not only drive economic growth but also social progress, across communities across the UK. We hope our optimism will not be misplaced. We are here to support the Government, through our membership, to deliver this plan but we will also highlight any areas where our members feel the plan falls short. Watch this space.
UK AI News in December 2024 Major Themes
Major Themes in AI News in the UK, in December 2024 We’ve analysed all of the major news stories in December 2024. You can find a list with links of the major stories, government announcements, research reports and more on this page. Here are some of the main themes. 1. Regulation and Governance The UK is actively shaping AI regulation with proposals to enhance transparency in AI training and balancing copyright protections. Consultations and amendments to data and copyright laws aim to align AI growth with creative industry needs. Calls for banning fully automated decision-making and enhancing ethical AI frameworks. Investment criteria and strategic oversight for government AI initiatives are being developed. 2. AI in Public Services and Infrastructure AI’s role in modernizing public services, including NHS trials for type 2 diabetes detection and benefits fraud detection, highlights its potential. Investment in data centers and AI-specific infrastructure underlines readiness for AI-driven services. 3. Economic and Strategic Development AI is positioned as a driver of the UK economy, with initiatives to ensure the country’s leadership in AI readiness and implementation. Efforts include AI hubs like the London AI Campus and partnerships for transforming AI models for sustainability. AI is a pivotal factor in clean energy transitions and climate tech investments. 4. Ethical and Social Concerns Concerns around AI’s impact on decision-making, privacy, and potential biases in systems used for public welfare, such as benefits fraud detection. Issues related to the exclusion of marginalized groups, like blind individuals, from the benefits of AI. Criticism of AI’s management in institutions like the Alan Turing Institute, and broader diversity challenges. 5. Creative and Cultural Industries Resistance from arts and media sectors to proposed copyright relaxations for AI model training. Studies exploring AI’s potential while safeguarding the creative industry’s integrity. 6. AI’s Role in Education and Accessibility AI is viewed as transformative for students with disabilities, although schools are adapting to leverage its full potential. The need for guidelines to optimize AI use in education while mitigating risks is emphasized. 7. International Collaboration and Leadership Partnerships, such as with Qatar, aim to enhance global AI collaboration. The UK is positioning AI as a tool for international peace and security. 8. Ethics, Risk, and Future Concerns Concerns about AI’s manipulation of decision-making and its long-term risks, with some experts warning of existential threats. Debates on balancing AI innovation with ethical oversight remain central. 9. Health and Environmental Applications Innovations like AI detecting heart conditions and identifying river hazards illustrate AI’s expanding role in healthcare and environmental safety. 10. Public Sentiment and Awareness Surveys indicate public attitudes toward AI and data, reflecting a mix of support and concern for its implications. 1. Regulation and Governance 2. AI in Public Services and Infrastructure 3. Economic and Strategic Development 4. Ethical and Social Concerns 5. Creative and Cultural Industries 6. AI’s Role in Education and Accessibility 7. International Collaboration and Leadership 8. Ethics, Risk, and Future Concerns 9. Health and Environmental Applications 10. Public Sentiment and Awareness
Regulating AI in the UK – Report Published
UKAI publishes the ‘Regulating AI in the UK’ report UKAI has issued a bold call to government for the artificial intelligence economy in the UK, urging immediate regulatory clarity to secure the UK’s position as a global leader in AI innovation. As the UK’s only AI trade association representing the whole AI economy, a new report warns that ambiguity around AI regulations is eroding business confidence, stifling investment, and holding back transformative services for customers across the UK. In a high-profile roundtable at the House of Lords, UKAI convened an influential mix of leaders from tech giants, startups, consumer brands, academia, and investors to chart a path for AI’s role in economic growth and social progress. The discussions revealed an urgent need for a regulatory framework that blends innovation-friendly policies with robust safeguards, striking a balance between the EU’s stringent rules and the US’s laissez-faire approach. “Burdening the AI sector with overregulation, underinvestment, or fear of the unknown isn’t just a missed opportunity – it’s a direct threat to Britain’s competitiveness on the global stage,” said Matt Warman, former AI Minister and UKAI Advisory Board member. The report, “Regulating AI in the UK,” outlines a vision for the UK to become the gold standard in AI regulation, with recommendations that include: AI Regulation Inquiry: A comprehensive investigation into the rapidly evolving AI landscape, emerging international policies, and the specific needs of UK businesses. Dedicated AI Governance: Suggestions include creating a standalone AI regulator, issuing clear guidance for SMEs, and appointing AI Officers (AIOs) to streamline governance. Ethical Seal of Approval: An industry-wide certification akin to B-Corp for companies adopting transparent, diverse, and inclusive AI practices. Educational Partnerships: Working with universities to create regulatory sandboxes and embedding AI-related technical and ethical training into education from an early age. As the Government prepares its long-awaited AI Opportunities Action Plan and the forthcoming AI Bill, UKAI positions itself as a key partner in shaping a forward-thinking, pragmatic regulatory framework. For industry insiders, academics, and policymakers, this report is more than a roadmap – it’s a rallying cry for Britain to seize the AI moment and establish itself as a beacon of global best practice. The full 30-page report, available to UKAI members, details actionable insights to ensure the UK’s AI sector thrives in a way that is fair, ethical, and economically impactful.
UKAI appoints advisory board
UKAI Welcomes Experts to Advisory Board Marking the next stage of its growth, UKAI is proud to announce the appointment of three founding members to its Advisory Board; former Shadow Secretary of State, Thangam Debbonaire, former Minister of State for AI, Matt Warman and digital expert Amir Malik. These well known figures from across the political spectrum, bring significant expertise and extensive networks in the AI sector and across government, ensuring that UKAI’s work is guided by strategic insight and informed by deep connections across policy and industry. The Advisory Board will play a crucial role in shaping UKAI’s vision, advising its executive team and amplifying its impact as it champions the UK’s AI sector. The current executive team comprises co-founders, Tim Flagg, Ben Howlett and Dominic Endicott who bring together the business, government and investor communities, respectively. Thangam Debbonaire was Labour Member of Parliament for Bristol West and Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. Commenting on her appointment to the Advisory Board, Thangam said, “AI is a big part of our present and an even bigger part of our future, as individuals, as a country and as a world. I’m delighted to have been invited to join UKAI as an advisor, and help to make AI a force for good in our lives and the world.“ Matt Warman was the Conservative Member of Parliament for Boston and Skegness and was Minister of State at the Department of Digital, Media, Culture and Sport between 2022 and 2024. Highlighting the timeliness of UKAI’s launch, Matt said, “Britain’s on the cusp of an AI revolution – UKAI serves as a powerful voice for the industry to speak to government, investors and the public.” Amir Malik is Global Managing Director of Digital Transformation & AI at Alvarez and Marsal, specialising in the targeted application of AI and emerging technologies. Prior to A&M, Amir led Accenture’s Digital Transformation and Data-Driven Marketing practice and was formerly at Google and Microsoft. Speaking about the unique opportunity for the UK to lead in AI, Amir added, “By leveraging its heritage as a world leader in technology innovation, capitalising on its booming AI start up industry and underlining its reputation for pioneering regulatory fairness, the UK has the trifecta of capabilities required to lead the charge on AI.” Speaking at the UKAI event at the House of Lords earlier this week, Tim Flagg, COO of UKAI said, “I’m excited to welcome Thangam, Matt and Amir to the advisory board, bringing substantial expertise, insights and contacts to help us achieve those objectives.”
The UK government will launch The Regulatory Innovation Office to curb red tape and speed up public access to innovative solutions, based on emerging technology.
The UK government will launch The Regulatory Innovation Office to curb red tape and speed up public access to innovative solutions, based on emerging technology. Creating new legislation is one of the key levers that governments have to deliver their strategic plans. Whilst there are a number of different types of new legislation, businesses are often concerned when they hear about new regulations. The General Data Protection Regulation was a case in point as it required businesses to comply with a dizzying list of new regulations. Whilst larger businesses were able to hire teams of lawyers to advise them on GDPR compliance, smaller businesses struggled. SMEs have less money, less time and fewer resources and new legislation can cause significant friction, draining those precious resources and hindering growth. So, the government’s move to set up RIO is a welcomed move. It signals an understanding of the impact of current regulations and hints at a better appreciation of the need to create regulations that work for technology businesses. This requires regulation that is designed around the specifics of individual industry sectors (such as life sciences) or more broadly designed for the rapid evolution of emerging technologies. Setting up an office specifically for this purpose indicates not just the right direction of travel, but a deeper understanding of how technology businesses operate. For now RIO is focused on four industry sectors: Engineering biology, space, AI and digital in healthcare and autonomous technology. Hopefully, if it is successful the same process can be extended to cover more industry sectors. RIO has 3 important aims: To coordinate existing regulators more effectively, to identify regulations that act as barriers to business growth and then to propose updates, with input from businesses. But the real business benefit is providing certainty. Businesses are by nature ‘glass-half-full’ but they view regulations as major risks, with the potential for significant impact. Although much of the detail is missing, this initial announcement indicates that the government is using its resources to mitigate that risk.
