Paris AI Summit Day One
Paris AI Summit Day One Cycling back from the Grand Palais, Paris’s streets were gridlocked thanks to road closures caused by the AI Summit. The disruption, attendees joked, was mimicking what’s to come with AI.But as Faculty’s Marc Warner told the Tony Blair Institute, ‘deals will be done here’ because the summit has, with a much wider remit than the Bletchley original, become the centre of AI hype and a genuine gathering point for the whole industry.What it hasn’t done, however, is covered the cracks in divergent international positions.Here are five questions people are asking themselves: Can Europe establish itself as the AI superpower it ought to be? Success stories such as Mistral are the exception, and will the major new investments announced here turn out to really be new money? Summit sources are briefing that who signs the final communique doesn’t matter, because of important announcements on monitoring the impact of AI via new observatories, and on commitments to open source. Is that just what they have to say with the US and the UK unlikely to sign it? Which is the biggest elephant in the room – the likelihood of AGI in 3-5 years, the impact of AI on energy use, or the challenges some maintain could come from AI destroying humanity? All of these are getting relatively little attention compared to expectations. With policymakers inevitably reacting rather than leading the AI revolution, what is the best course to try to take? Attracting investment and focusing on skills feels like the only option, but neither is likely to be sufficient for countries currently lagging. What’s the best way to encourage adoption? Literacy, identifying game-changing data sets and also working out how to reshape tasks so AI is most useful – all of these have interesting roles to play, but nobody has neat answers here in Paris. Tomorrow, JD Vance and other political leaders will make the weather – hopefully an improvement on the metaphorical and literal cold rain here so far.
How do we evaluate the AI Opportunities Action Plan?
How do we evaluate the AI Opportunities Action Plan? The UK Government has announced that the AI Opportunities Action Plan is coming, and when it arrives I am sure that there will be a lot of opinions on whether it is good, or bad and on what it misses, and hopefully what it gets right. Over the last few months UKAI has been talking to members, businesses across the UK in the AI sector, to understand what they care about most. These have been distilled down into 5 Policy Pillars. UKAI can now measure the Action Plan against these 5 Policy Pillars in our Evaluation Scorecard. This gives us a way to quantify the plan, comparing it with previous and future policies, and measuring how effective it is at supporting UK businesses in the AI Sector. We’re confident that there will be a lot of great actionable ideas. Our optimism is because the plan was authored by Matt Clifford, a successful, well known and well connected entrepreneur. Clifford understands the realities of running businesses. In addition, Clifford and the department have spoken to many businesses across the AI sector. UKAI was formed to provide a voice into the Government for the AI sector and to help the Government implement its AI policies and plans, so for us the Action Plan is fundamental. It should be the linchpin that brings Government and Businesses together with Academia and Investors in a plan that can not only drive economic growth but also social progress, across communities across the UK. We hope our optimism will not be misplaced. We are here to support the Government, through our membership, to deliver this plan but we will also highlight any areas where our members feel the plan falls short. Watch this space.
