The UK Government has delayed its long-anticipated artificial intelligence regulation bill by at least a year, pushing it into the next parliamentary session, expected after the King’s Speech in May 2026. The move aims to allow time for the development of a more comprehensive framework to address the growing complexities of AI.
Science, Innovation and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle confirmed the postponement, which has sparked concern about the ongoing lack of oversight in a sector evolving at speed. Initially, Labour had planned to introduce a focused AI bill targeting large language models such as ChatGPT, requiring companies to submit systems for review by the AI Security Institute. The goal was to manage risk while strengthening the UK’s position in the global AI race.
The delay reflects a broader strategy to align UK regulations with those of the United States. According to a government source quoted by The Guardian, the revised bill may include copyright provisions designed to strike a balance between supporting creators and encouraging AI innovation. This effort includes ongoing discussions with rights holders and technology leaders.
Copyright has already become a flashpoint. A separate data bill that permits AI companies to train models on copyrighted content—unless creators opt out—has provoked backlash from the House of Lords and the creative industries. Artists including Elton John, Paul McCartney and Kate Bush have criticised the policy, warning it could erode copyright protections and damage the cultural sector.
Public opinion appears to support greater oversight. A survey by the Ada Lovelace Institute and the Alan Turing Institute found that 88% of people believe the government should intervene when AI products pose serious risks. Over 75% also support formal regulation over private sector self-governance.
The debate comes amid rising demand for AI skills across the UK job market. A report by PwC highlights a long-term increase in AI-related job postings, even as overall AI vacancies have recently dipped. The findings point to a sustained need for skilled workers as AI adoption grows.
The government is under pressure to strike a balance—fostering innovation while safeguarding intellectual property and public trust. Some, including investor Nathan Benaich, have welcomed the delay as an opportunity to craft sound policy. But others warn that timely regulation is essential, especially as AI becomes more deeply embedded in daily life.
As ministers prepare the next steps, the challenge remains to develop legislation that keeps pace with technology while addressing mounting ethical, legal and economic concerns.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
